Fuzzy Thoughts

Personal Website of Ryan Murphy

Search Site:

Thoughts to Ponder

Quaere verum
  Seek the Truth

"Limitations without understanding will get you killed"
  The Guardian

"The art of being wise is the art of knowing what to overlook"
  William James

State of CT vs. Julie Amero - witness Minor Child 6

Posted by Ryan on June 3rd, 2007.

This witness was the second to last witness called by the State, and was a student in Mr. Napp’s homeroom period.

According to his testimony, Ms. Amero spent most of the period at the computer. Eventually, he had to throw something away, and he was able to see what was on the screen.

Q: As best as you can, what type of images did you see on the computer?
A: I saw naked males and females having sexual intercourse.
Q: Sexual intercourse. What type in general, was it all?
A: All

Now, just to play a semantics devil’s advocate, did Mr. Smith really mean what type of sexual intercourse, or did he mean positions? When I hear sexual intercourse, I think of vaginal penetration, so unless there’s a woman with two, there is only one kind. Even looking up the definition of sexual intercourse on Google results in only one definition that mentions vaginal, oral, and anal.

Transcript



Related Posts:

State of CT vs. Julie Amero - witness Minor Child 3 •State of CT vs. Julie Amero - witness Minor Child 2 •State of CT vs. Julie Amero - witness Minor Child 4 •State of CT vs. Julie Amero - witness Minor Child 5 •State of CT vs. Julie Amero - witness Minor Child 1 

Add a Comment!

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>